Commercial hatchery trial proves viability of site of injection in ovo for optimal flock immunization
RALEIGH, N.C.--How does site of injection affect the immunology of a
bird when vaccinated in ovo? This question was addressed at the 2009
Poultry Science Association Meeting where Brett Hopkins, MS, DVM, Ph.D.,
DACPV, associate director for outcomes research with Pfizer Animal
Health, presented data from a large scale commercial hatchery trial
comparing the only two commercially available egg injection systems in
the United States.
When comparing the accuracy of delivery to the correct site of
injection, Hopkins found that Pfizer’s Embrex® Inovoject® System
exhibited significantly greater correct in ovo site of vaccine
delivery (95.3 percent) as compared with in ovo delivery using
Avitech’s ManualJectTM System (52.3 percent).
In conjunction with Chris Williams, MS, Ph.D., director of poultry
technical services Pfizer Poultry Health, Hopkins and Williams designed
the trial to evaluate the quality of vaccine delivery as measured by
site of injection in ovo, noting that the ability to provide protection
against disease after hatch begins with the vaccine being delivered to
the correct site of injection in the egg.
“Proper vaccination should be the primary criteria used to evaluate an in
ovo injection system because uniform vaccine delivery may provide
earlier immunity to diseases when performed correctly,” stated Hopkins.
Proper sites of injection were defined as the amnionic sac, subcutaneous
injection to the breast, intramuscular injection into the breast or any
combination of the previous. Injection and vaccination of the air cell,
allantois, yolk sac, a combination of these sites, or no vaccine
deposited at all, were classified as improper and therefore provide
questionable disease protection.
A 2000 study demonstrates that the efficacy of vaccines delivered in
ovo into the amnion or embryo is greater than 90 percent, regardless
of day of injection and breeder flock type ,while vaccines delivered in
ovo via the allantois or air cell are less than 50 percent effective
in providing disease protection.
“Application of the vaccine in other areas of the egg has also been
shown to greatly reduce the protective index against disease
challenges,” said Hopkins.
Comparison of In Ovo Vaccine Delivery Systems By Injection Site
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inovoject
System
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ManualJect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Count
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Count
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AC/comb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALL/AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All/comb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AM/comb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1: In ovo system vaccine delivery categorized by injection
site - AC (air cell), AC/comb (air cell plus any other combination of
injection sites), ALL (Allantois), ALL/AM (Allantois/Amnion), ALL/comb
(Allantois plus any other combination of injection sites other than
amnion), AM (Amnion), AM/comb (amnion plus any other combination of
injection sites other than allantois), EMB (embryo), YS (yolk sac)
Comparison of In Ovo Vaccine Delivery
Overall,
the Inovoject System performed 871 total injections to eggs with viable
embryos while the ManualJect System injected 930 eggs with viable
embryos. Of those 871 viable eggs injected by the Inovoject System, 830
or 95.3% were performed at the proper site of injection. The ManualJect
System delivered only 486 or only 52.3% at the proper site of injection.
Comparing the different injection sites occurring in good eggs, the
Inovoject System injected 730 eggs in the amnion and 95 in the embryo,
classifying them as proper injections. In comparison, the ManualJect
System had only 336 amniotic injections and 135 embryonic injections,
followed by 185 combination injections occurring in the allantois and
amnion, which is considered an improper injection.
This study uncovers a primary question of concern when injecting in ovo:
Why should producers be concerned about where a vaccine is delivered?
Vaccine delivery is critical to an embryo’s integrity and survival and
its proper immunization for protection against disease challenges.
“Conducting large scale evaluations in a commercial setting such as
this, establishes relative value and importance of proper in ovo
injection for our customers,” stated Hopkins. “The objective of this
trial was to reassert the importance of site of injection in ovo
and its vital role in providing early, effective and uniform protection
against disease.”
About PPH
The Poultry Health Division of Pfizer Animal
Health is a leading provider of innovative, high-performance poultry
health solutions to the global poultry industry. Built upon the combined
strength and experience of Embrex and Pfizer Animal Health, the Pfizer
Poultry Health is committed to developing and marketing commercially
novel vaccine, mechanical and data management products which continue to
provide increasing value to the global poultry health industry. For more
information about the Pfizer Poultry Health, visit us online at www.pfizerpoultryhealth.com.

For More Information:
Melinda Freson
Pfizer Poultry Health
919-314-2698
melinda.freson@pfizer.com
or
Emily Wozniak
MartinWilliams
612-342-9635
e.wozniak@martinwilliams.com